UJI KETELITIAN CETAK PRODUK LENGKUNG PRINTER 3D ANET A8
Abstract
This study aims to determine the accuracy of the Anet A8 3D Printer in printing curved products with the infill speed, print speed and layer height factors in order to obtain optimal results and determine the most influential parameters in printing curved products using the Anet A8 3D Printer. The method used in testing the accuracy of printing 3D printing products is Taguchi L9. From this study it can be concluded that the most optimal process parameters for the accuracy of the dimensions of the specimen diameter are successively for accuracy, namely layer height (0.3000 mm), infil speed (50 mm/s) and layer speed (30 mm/s) then the most optimal process parameters for the accuracy of the curved dimensions of the specimen are successively for accuracy, namely layer height (0.2000 mm), infil speed (50 mm/s). s) and layer speed (40 mm/s). The results of the ANOVA analysis show that the most contributed parameter in printing curved specimens with the diameter dimension is the layer height and the curved dimension is the infill speed.
Downloads
References
[2] Moylan S., Slotwinski J., Cooke A., Jurrens K., & Donmez M.A.. An Additive Manufacturing Test Artifact. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Vol. 119, 2014, pp. 429-456.
[3] Mahros Darsin, Nurcholis Alfian Mahardika, Gaguk Jatisukamto, Mochamad Edoward Ramadhan, Boy Arief Fachri and Mohd Sabri Hussin. Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on Dimensional Accuracy Using eSteel Filaments. Journal of 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Vol 1. No. 1, pp. 1-7.
[4] Schmutzler C, Zimmermann A, Zaeh MF. Compensating Warpage of 3D Printed Parts Using Free-form Deformation. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 41, 2016, pp 1017-1022.
[5] Solomon J, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran J. Materials Today: Proceedings: A Review on The Various Processing Parameters in FDM. 2020: 10-15.
[6] Nancharaiah T, Ranga Raju D, Ramachandra Raju V. An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components. Int J Emerg Technol 2010;1:106–11.
[7] Shahrain M, Didier T, Lim GK, Qureshi AJ. Fast Deviation Simulation for “Fused Deposition Modeling” Process. Procedia CIRP 2016;43:327–32.
[8] Braconnier DJ, Jensen RE, Peterson AM. Processing parameter correlations in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2020;31:100924.
[9] Chang DY, Huang BH. Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2011;53:1027–37.
[10] Salem H., Abouchadi H. & Elbikri K. PLA Mechanical Performance Before and After 3D Printing. Int. J. Advanced Comp. Sci and Application. Vol. 13, No 3, 2022, pp. 324-330.
[11] Soejanto, I.. Desain Eksperimen dengan Metode Taguchi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. 2009.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yanuar Burhanuddin, Made Gita Arya Candra, Achmad Yahya Teguh Panuju, Suryadiwansa Harun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The paper presented is assumed not to contain proprietary materials that are not protected by patents or patent applications. Responsibility for technical content and for protection from proprietary materials is the responsibility of the author and their organization and not the responsibility of the machine or its editorial staff. The primary author (first / appropriate) is responsible for ensuring that the article has been viewed and approved by all other authors. It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all copyright release permits required for the use of any copyrighted material in the manuscript before submission.
